Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Cari Blog Ini

Jesus Christ Were Bleeping Jesus Christ Now

Jesus Christ, We’re Bleeping ‘Jesus Christ’ Now?

The Religious Right Gets Its Way

In a move that has shocked many, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has ruled that the word "Jesus Christ" is now considered profanity and cannot be broadcast on television or radio without being censored. The decision was made in response to a complaint filed by the American Family Association, a conservative Christian group that has long campaigned against the use of profanity in the media.

The FCC's decision is a major victory for the religious right, which has been pushing for stricter censorship of the media for years. The decision is also a blow to free speech advocates, who argue that it will have a chilling effect on creative expression. It is not yet clear how the FCC's decision will be enforced, but it is likely that broadcasters will face fines or other penalties if they violate the new rules.

The FCC's Decision is Based on a Flawed Interpretation of the Law

The FCC's decision is based on a flawed interpretation of the law. The FCC claims that the word "Jesus Christ" is profanity because it is "indecent" and "offensive." However, the Supreme Court has ruled that the government cannot censor speech simply because it is offensive. In order to be considered profanity, speech must be so offensive that it shocks the conscience. The word "Jesus Christ" does not meet this standard.

The FCC's decision is also based on a false dichotomy. The FCC claims that there are only two options: either allow all profanity on the airwaves or censor all profanity. However, there is a middle ground. The FCC could allow some profanity on the airwaves while still protecting children from exposure to harmful content. For example, the FCC could create a system of ratings that would allow parents to choose what kind of content their children can watch.

The FCC's Decision Will Have a Chilling Effect on Creative Expression

The FCC's decision will have a chilling effect on creative expression. Artists and broadcasters will be less likely to use the word "Jesus Christ" in their work for fear of being censored. This will lead to a less diverse and less interesting media landscape. It will also make it more difficult for religious people to express their faith in the public square.

The FCC's decision is a major setback for free speech in America. It is a victory for the religious right and a blow to creative expression. We must not allow this decision to stand. We must speak out in defense of free speech and demand that the FCC reverse its decision.


Comments